Skip to main content

Why We Need Each Other


Human beings need other humans to help us process and regulate our emotions; this is the primary 'intersubjectivity' we all seek from others, the underlying need that bonds us together. Starting at approximately 3 months of age, well before the acquisition of language, the right hemisphere of an infant's brain is employing the body—via gestures, sounds and facial expressions—to send out social cues indicating its basic states—excitement, fear, surprise, etc—which the primary caregiver reads and reflects back. This exchange is vital for the infant's social development and sense of security.

However, the primary caregiver does more than simply 'mirroring' back an infant's emotional state; a caregiver, as part of the empathetic, sustained, resonant exchange, helps the infant regulate its early emotional states. It's an unconscious process, where the caretaker either decreases or amplifies a mood via reassuring facial gestures and body language; even from the earliest age we have brain functions set to read the smallest micro-expressions of other people.

There are two kinds of emotion regulation: vitalization and soothing. Vitalization is the stabilization of a positive emotional state, a joy that is sustainable yet not destructive. Soothing is the regulation of negative emotional states, such as fear and frustration, without which we might easily wind up overwhelmed. Proper emotion regulation allows us to move from one internal state to another without discordant mood swings.

There are three kinds of interpersonal connection necessary for regulation to occur: attunement, the state of paying attention to each other; sympathy, the intellectual understanding of another person's situation, which allows us to establish a connection in language; empathy, the ability to internally feel (via our mirror neurons) the emotions being expressed by another.

In our adult journeys we often lose touch with people who can provide us with emotion regulation—those with whom we feel safe to express our most troubling feelings, those who, rather than inclining to 'solve our problems' listen patiently, providing a safe container, as we express the difficult and exciting, and unconsciously help us achieve some stability amidst the upheavals of life.

Without these intersubjective connections that provide vitalization and soothing, we will seek regulation through other means, such as drugs that excite (cocaine, speed) or calming (alcohol, heroin). In our compulsive search for empathy we may mistake sex for intimacy, or the approval from others won from our accomplishments in the world as a form of emotional bonding. They are not, they are hollow enterprises that lead to addictive cycles.

Reestablishing secure connections is the point of relational mindfulness: when we sit with each other and pay deep attention to the underlying emotions being conveyed, feeling them internally, expressing them back, we provide the stability we spend our lives searching for, creating a therapeutic bond more powerful than any drug or worldly success story can possibly provide.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Last week I was talking to someone about homelessness. I usually buy food at the grocery store and hand over a sandwich, or a bottled juice and fruit, something when I see homeless men near my grocery store. And that makes me feel good (self-serving, yes!). The man I was talking to said that he believes one of the best things one can do is to simply introduce yourself and ask the person their name.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 ways to resist obsessive thoughts (Vitakkasanthana)

The mind can be thought of as a committee
Our thoughts are present by many "voices," some skillful and unskillful
W there are some skillful voices in there, focusing on useful ideas, there are also the many voices in the "committee" that cause us suffering by advancing and encouraging useless, stress inducing ideas, plans, worries.

Some examples of unskillful, stress producing obsessions
—are dedictated to figuring out the worst possible outcomes (fear) of any situation
—fixate on unknowable future events, i.e. what will we experience later in life?
—try to figure out what other people are thinking about us
—compare ourselves with others, especially in material concerns
in general, the buddha broke these down the thoughts of craving, aversion and delusion.

How unskillful internal voices persuade us
some of these committee members try to get their way by
—most work by repeating the same thought over and over
—some split into thousands of variations that seem different, but are …

The Two Arrows of Suffering

“When hit with discomfort, the conventional reaction is to whine and regret, kick oneself, take it hard. So we feel two afflictions: 1) the inevitable, physical feelings [a first arrow the world blasts us with] and 2) the additional, mental reactions [the second arrow we shoot into ourself]. We may fail to note any relief or escape from uncomfortable feelings [the first arrow] other than to distract ourselves with sensual pleasure. So we cling to diversions, rather than observing what is actually present, the arising and passing of feelings.”
—The Buddha, The Arrow Sutta
This teaching is often summarized as “Pain is inevitable, but suffering is optional.” We have in life two forms of distress in life. The first arises from the unavoidable events that occur in life: the pains, insults, rejections, losses, separations, aging, sickness and on. Such events quickly give rise to inevitable, uncomfortable physical expressions, such as feelings that the wind knocked out of us, a hollowness in …

Buddhism and the Bilateral Brain: A Brief Sketch of Ideas Ranging from the Ancient Greeks, Early Buddhism, Nietzsche and a Smattering of Neuroscience

In Greek mythology, Apollo was the god of the reason and logic, appealing to the ideals of precision and abstract purity. Dionysus was the god of the spontaneous, the emotional, embodied, often irrational instinct. These gods were not considered to be antagonistic but rather complimentary.
Today, from the vantage of contemporary neuropsychology, especially in the works of Iain McGilchrist, Allan Schore and Robert Ornstein, we can readily note how these twin gods neatly represented the asymmetrical brain: • Apollo depicts the perspective of the left hemisphere, which represents the world in static ideas; reality is comprised of separate and fragmented objects, abstracted from their context; reality is separated into parts. The kind of attention is inherently dualistic and isolating—self versus other, me versus you, humankind versus nature; this attention tends to represent the fluid and organic as lifeless, static, in language or symbols. • Dionysus depicts the worldview of the r…